Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

2 Responses

  1. Jon-Luc Aragon says:

    Interesting thoughts. I haven’t seen it yet, but I have some pre-watch thoughts. J.J. Abrams seems to have settled into being a pure fan-service director. Not the worst thing to be, but Star Trek Into Darkness, The Force Awakens and seemingly now this film appear to fit into the good but not great category, with few original ideas and nothing that really pushes the envelope in any way or takes the characters in new directions. A lot of Star Wars fans don’t seem to mind this, but some do, and as you’ve mentioned, eventually things will have to change or at least branch out a bit if the franchise is to survive long-term. Even something as mighty as Star Wars can fizzle without proper inspiration behind it. This is evident in the fact that Rise of Skywalker apparently did not live up to expectations box-office wise during opening weekend, though of course it’ll still make more than enough money anyway.

    Now, if only I could convince you that The Last Jedi is The Dark Knight of this new trilogy and better than A New Hope Redux…

    • Vincent Leo says:

      No doubt, Disney wanted Abrams back because they feared to risk alienating more fans by letting directors do what they want with the property. I’m not sure how I feel about that. George Lucas let Irvin Kirshner and Richard Marquand direct his follow-ups to Star Wars, but I’m sure the deal was that they were going to deliver the vision Lucas wanted and not their own. However, by the time Return of the Jedi rolled around, it was clear that Lucas was as interested in merchandising as he was storytelling, and the Ewoks resulted.

      J.J. Abrams, no doubt, was brought back, not because he hit a home run with The Force Awakens, but because he was more interested in delivering what fans wanted, or what Disney thinks fans wanted, than in trying to put his stamp on things. I would criticize him for that, but I am confident that if George Lucas were the one calling the shots for the sequel trilogy, that’s also what would be delivered.

      The financial realities are apparent these days. “Going to the movies” is not really what it used to be. Not with big-screen TVs and home theater systems that give you a great experience at less cost and no hassles of kids running up and down the aisles or annoying jerks who won’t put away their cell phones. The primary motivating factor to go to a movie theater rather than wait to see it in the home is to keep a film from getting spoiled, which is one big reason why Avengers: Endgame proved to be monumentally popular in the theaters. That and the fact that there was confidence that all of those heroes people love would be brought back. Had Disney actually killed them all, you can bet there would be a massive backlash.

      The Last Jedi, I feel, is a good film, but to many, it’s not a good “Star Wars” film. While I would like to see Star Wars break out of its current cycle of only providing fan-service and Easter Egg hunts, I can’t say I’m immune to rejecting franchise films because they do something with the characters I dislike. Example: some of the films after Aliens in the “Alien” franchise are objectively good, but I hate, hate, hate what they did to the story. I no more want to see Ripley die, to follow a Ripley I know to be a clone or to see a rogue android to have been the one to create the Xenomorphs than some people want to see Luke Skywalker have had his entire happy ending after Return of the Jedi denied, or to stop looking to the past and forge your own destiny, which runs counter to the philosophy set by the original trilogy. It’s going to step on some toes, even if Rian Johnson was right that something has to break things out of the current rut. The past does need to get destroyed if people want them to grow. I guess you, if you’re a visionary filmmaker, have to convince the viewers that this is the way to go before doing it, or they will turn against you.

      This is why I wrote the line, “The only way to keep the franchise from dying is to preserve it in a perpetual state of adolescence.” If we want to see new and original Star Wars films, we have to break the current cycle. Rian Johnson had the right idea, but to some people, he did it at the wrong time in the wrong way because they felt that he was breaking the cycle by breaking the original trilogy, which, to some, is off-limits. Some fans would say to do what you want in the Star Wars universe, but the sanctity of Luke Skywalker’s story arc needs to remain preserved. I still like The Last Jedi quite a bit, but after seeing Blade Runner 2049 (which I still can’t embrace because I don’t like what they did with the characters from the original film), I understood much better the distinction between making a good movie and making a good franchise movie. Sometimes it is hard to do both if you’re not the one setting the vision.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *